https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306929 Revised UGC guidelines were treated as standards to maintain academic uniformity, and universities were considered competent to modify their examination systems accordingly. The continued use of an older external examination pattern was not an enforceable right merely because it had existed for a long period, so the change was not unlawful. The right to education did not include a right to insist on a particular examination pattern if access to education remained available. Legitimate expectation and promissory estoppel did not compel continuation of the old scheme, because there was no promise of permanence and the policy change served public interest without being arbitrary, unreasonable, discriminatory, or violative of Articles 14 and 21. en-us Tue, 02 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Mar 2023 11:33:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306929 Revised UGC guidelines were treated as standards to maintain academic uniformity, and universities were considered competent to modify their examination systems accordingly. The continued use of an older external examination pattern was not an enforceable right merely because it had existed for a long period, so the change was not unlawful. The right to education did not include a right to insist on a particular examination pattern if access to education remained available. Legitimate expectation and promissory estoppel did not compel continuation of the old scheme, because there was no promise of permanence and the policy change served public interest without being arbitrary, unreasonable, discriminatory, or violative of Articles 14 and 21. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 02 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306929