https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306926 The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's decision to grant relief to an advocate who violated examination instructions during the selection process for Civil Judges in Tamil Nadu State Judicial Service. Despite the High Court's leniency based on sympathetic grounds, the Supreme Court emphasized the mandatory nature of the instructions, stating that strict compliance was necessary to maintain fairness and integrity in public appointments. Granting relief would have set a problematic precedent, leading the Supreme Court to affirm the instructions' mandatory nature and overturn the High Court's judgment. en-us Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Mar 2023 11:22:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306926 The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's decision to grant relief to an advocate who violated examination instructions during the selection process for Civil Judges in Tamil Nadu State Judicial Service. Despite the High Court's leniency based on sympathetic grounds, the Supreme Court emphasized the mandatory nature of the instructions, stating that strict compliance was necessary to maintain fairness and integrity in public appointments. Granting relief would have set a problematic precedent, leading the Supreme Court to affirm the instructions' mandatory nature and overturn the High Court's judgment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306926