<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 249 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434863</link>
    <description>Unexplained prolonged non-issuance of a notification after positive final anti-dumping findings may be treated as a decision not to impose duty, and such non-action is appealable under the Customs Tariff Act. Where the Central Government proposes not to accept the designated authority&#039;s recommendation, it must record reasons and comply with natural justice; pending a fresh decision, provisional assessment was considered appropriate and the matter was remitted for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2023 17:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=706896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 249 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434863</link>
      <description>Unexplained prolonged non-issuance of a notification after positive final anti-dumping findings may be treated as a decision not to impose duty, and such non-action is appealable under the Customs Tariff Act. Where the Central Government proposes not to accept the designated authority&#039;s recommendation, it must record reasons and comply with natural justice; pending a fresh decision, provisional assessment was considered appropriate and the matter was remitted for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>