<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 238 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434852</link>
    <description>The case involved a dispute over refund entitlement and credit eligibility under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. M/s Deloitte Global Financial Advisory India Pvt Ltd sought a refund for services used in services rendered abroad. The court analyzed the definition of &#039;input service&#039; and ruled that certain services lacked nexus with exported services, making them ineligible for credit. The denial of refund for specific services raised questions about rule application. The judgment highlighted the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to legal requirements, ultimately setting aside the impugned order due to procedural irregularities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 11:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=706882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 238 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434852</link>
      <description>The case involved a dispute over refund entitlement and credit eligibility under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. M/s Deloitte Global Financial Advisory India Pvt Ltd sought a refund for services used in services rendered abroad. The court analyzed the definition of &#039;input service&#039; and ruled that certain services lacked nexus with exported services, making them ineligible for credit. The denial of refund for specific services raised questions about rule application. The judgment highlighted the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to legal requirements, ultimately setting aside the impugned order due to procedural irregularities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>