<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 231 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434845</link>
    <description>Rule 3(7)(b) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 permitted utilisation of credit of additional duty of excise paid on or after 1 April 2000 towards payment of excise duty, and the court found the assessee&#039;s use of such credit for basic excise duty and special excise duty to be correct. The same controversy had already been decided in the assessee&#039;s favour in earlier proceedings, and the departmental challenge had previously failed because no substantial question of law arose. Applying that position, the court declined to interfere and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s view that the credit was properly utilised. No substantial question of law arose for consideration under section 35G.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 15:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=706873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 231 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434845</link>
      <description>Rule 3(7)(b) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 permitted utilisation of credit of additional duty of excise paid on or after 1 April 2000 towards payment of excise duty, and the court found the assessee&#039;s use of such credit for basic excise duty and special excise duty to be correct. The same controversy had already been decided in the assessee&#039;s favour in earlier proceedings, and the departmental challenge had previously failed because no substantial question of law arose. Applying that position, the court declined to interfere and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s view that the credit was properly utilised. No substantial question of law arose for consideration under section 35G.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>