https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306924 The court upheld the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission's rejection of applications due to non-signing in specified columns, emphasizing the importance of signature for authenticity. It found no ambiguity in the application form, stating clear instructions were given in both English and Tamil. The court rejected claims of discrimination in rectifying defects and emphasized the mandatory nature of application form instructions. It ruled that candidates were not entitled to rectify mistakes like non-signing, as strict compliance was required. All writ petitions were dismissed, affirming the TNPSC's decision to reject non-compliant applications. en-us Mon, 12 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Mar 2023 10:55:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306924 The court upheld the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission's rejection of applications due to non-signing in specified columns, emphasizing the importance of signature for authenticity. It found no ambiguity in the application form, stating clear instructions were given in both English and Tamil. The court rejected claims of discrimination in rectifying defects and emphasized the mandatory nature of application form instructions. It ruled that candidates were not entitled to rectify mistakes like non-signing, as strict compliance was required. All writ petitions were dismissed, affirming the TNPSC's decision to reject non-compliant applications. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306924