https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306923 The appellant, a Syrian Catholic by birth, was denied eligibility for reservation under Articles 15(4) and 16(4) of the Constitution by marrying into a backward class. The court emphasized that reservation benefits are for those born into backward classes and not acquired through marriage. It highlighted the constitutional goal of providing equal opportunities and removing social and economic inequality. The court dismissed the appeals, affirming that the appellant, born into a forward caste, cannot claim reservation benefits by marrying into a backward class, as it would undermine the constitutional objective. en-us Thu, 04 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Mar 2023 10:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306923 The appellant, a Syrian Catholic by birth, was denied eligibility for reservation under Articles 15(4) and 16(4) of the Constitution by marrying into a backward class. The court emphasized that reservation benefits are for those born into backward classes and not acquired through marriage. It highlighted the constitutional goal of providing equal opportunities and removing social and economic inequality. The court dismissed the appeals, affirming that the appellant, born into a forward caste, cannot claim reservation benefits by marrying into a backward class, as it would undermine the constitutional objective. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 04 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306923