<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 2005 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306905</link>
    <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad partially allowed the appeal regarding disallowance of interest expense, adhoc disallowances, and deduction restrictions, directing fresh adjudication on certain issues. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deleted due to the annulment of the disallowance. The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting disallowances and penalties, partially allowing one appeal and fully allowing another.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2023 16:59:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=706852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 2005 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306905</link>
      <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad partially allowed the appeal regarding disallowance of interest expense, adhoc disallowances, and deduction restrictions, directing fresh adjudication on certain issues. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deleted due to the annulment of the disallowance. The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting disallowances and penalties, partially allowing one appeal and fully allowing another.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>