<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 252 - CESTAT AHEMDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32043</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the denial of Cenvat credit on invoices raised in the name of contractors. It found that ownership of capital goods is not crucial for claiming credit when goods are used in manufacturing excisable products. The Tribunal emphasized that actual utilization in the manufacturing process is key, leading to the decision to set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order and grant the appellant relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 252 - CESTAT AHEMDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32043</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the denial of Cenvat credit on invoices raised in the name of contractors. It found that ownership of capital goods is not crucial for claiming credit when goods are used in manufacturing excisable products. The Tribunal emphasized that actual utilization in the manufacturing process is key, leading to the decision to set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order and grant the appellant relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>