<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 1156 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306916</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the appeal against registration cancellation under CGST Act. The court directed the petitioner to file an application under Section 30 within 15 days and instructed the Appellate Authority to consider the application on merits within four weeks. The judgment emphasized procedural compliance and substantive review, ensuring the petitioner&#039;s right to challenge the registration cancellation was preserved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 13:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=706840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 1156 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306916</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the appeal against registration cancellation under CGST Act. The court directed the petitioner to file an application under Section 30 within 15 days and instructed the Appellate Authority to consider the application on merits within four weeks. The judgment emphasized procedural compliance and substantive review, ensuring the petitioner&#039;s right to challenge the registration cancellation was preserved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>