<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1352 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306920</link>
    <description>Inherent powers under Section 151 CPC cannot be used to recall or unsettle a final decree where the Code provides an effective remedy such as appeal, review, revision or a fresh suit; those powers are confined to filling procedural gaps and securing justice, and they cannot override express procedural safeguards. On judicial bias, the governing standard is whether a right-minded person would perceive a real likelihood of bias, so prior appearance in connected proceedings may justify recusal where it creates an appearance problem. The text also notes that recusal would have been the safer course, although that did not affect the outcome described.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 18:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=706837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1352 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306920</link>
      <description>Inherent powers under Section 151 CPC cannot be used to recall or unsettle a final decree where the Code provides an effective remedy such as appeal, review, revision or a fresh suit; those powers are confined to filling procedural gaps and securing justice, and they cannot override express procedural safeguards. On judicial bias, the governing standard is whether a right-minded person would perceive a real likelihood of bias, so prior appearance in connected proceedings may justify recusal where it creates an appearance problem. The text also notes that recusal would have been the safer course, although that did not affect the outcome described.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>