https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32040 The Tribunal upheld the appellants' arguments regarding the demand of Rs. 22,41,76,788/- for the period from 16-5-2005 to 31-3-2006, accepting their compliance with Rule 6(3)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The demand of Rs. 2,77,15,038/- for the periods from 2001-02 to 2005-06 was set aside due to full excise duty payment on the intermediate product. The Tribunal upheld the extended period of limitation for undisclosed use of soda ash in exempted products. The demand for reversal of Cenvat credit of Rs. 15,85,909/- on bags used for packing soda ash captively consumed was also set aside. en-us Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32040 The Tribunal upheld the appellants' arguments regarding the demand of Rs. 22,41,76,788/- for the period from 16-5-2005 to 31-3-2006, accepting their compliance with Rule 6(3)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The demand of Rs. 2,77,15,038/- for the periods from 2001-02 to 2005-06 was set aside due to full excise duty payment on the intermediate product. The Tribunal upheld the extended period of limitation for undisclosed use of soda ash in exempted products. The demand for reversal of Cenvat credit of Rs. 15,85,909/- on bags used for packing soda ash captively consumed was also set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32040