<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 153 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32038</link>
    <description>Modvat credit is supportable where contemporaneous records and corroborative evidence establish actual receipt and use of inputs in manufacture; denial cannot rest on isolated discrepancies such as vehicle numbers when the documentary and testimonial record is consistent. On that basis, reversal of credit and consequential penalties were found unsustainable, and the assessee&#039;s challenge succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 153 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32038</link>
      <description>Modvat credit is supportable where contemporaneous records and corroborative evidence establish actual receipt and use of inputs in manufacture; denial cannot rest on isolated discrepancies such as vehicle numbers when the documentary and testimonial record is consistent. On that basis, reversal of credit and consequential penalties were found unsustainable, and the assessee&#039;s challenge succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>