<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 243 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32031</link>
    <description>The case involved an appeal against a service tax demand for outward transportation of products. The Tribunal remanded the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision after finding that the impugned order did not address a relevant circular clarifying the credit of service tax on freight. The appellant was granted a hearing opportunity, and the appeals were allowed by way of remand, setting aside the penalties imposed by the original authority on the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 243 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32031</link>
      <description>The case involved an appeal against a service tax demand for outward transportation of products. The Tribunal remanded the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision after finding that the impugned order did not address a relevant circular clarifying the credit of service tax on freight. The appellant was granted a hearing opportunity, and the appeals were allowed by way of remand, setting aside the penalties imposed by the original authority on the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>