<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 150 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32014</link>
    <description>The appeal for restoration was rejected as the appellant failed to check the cause list for the next hearing date, despite receiving the initial hearing notice. The Tribunal decided on the merits based on relevant case laws and facts, ultimately deeming the request for restoration as not genuine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 150 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32014</link>
      <description>The appeal for restoration was rejected as the appellant failed to check the cause list for the next hearing date, despite receiving the initial hearing notice. The Tribunal decided on the merits based on relevant case laws and facts, ultimately deeming the request for restoration as not genuine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>