<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 149 - CESTAT AHEMDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31998</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit could not be denied to the recipient where goods were received under a valid duty-paid excise invoice and the record showed that duty had been paid and the goods had been received. The applicable credit rules allowed credit on the basis of a manufacturer&#039;s invoice, subject to reasonable steps by the recipient to verify duty payment. The dispute over whether the supplier was the actual manufacturer was not decisive for the recipient&#039;s credit claim when the foundational facts of invoice, duty payment and receipt were established. The credit disallowance, related interest and penalty, and confiscation-linked reliefs accordingly did not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 149 - CESTAT AHEMDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31998</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit could not be denied to the recipient where goods were received under a valid duty-paid excise invoice and the record showed that duty had been paid and the goods had been received. The applicable credit rules allowed credit on the basis of a manufacturer&#039;s invoice, subject to reasonable steps by the recipient to verify duty payment. The dispute over whether the supplier was the actual manufacturer was not decisive for the recipient&#039;s credit claim when the foundational facts of invoice, duty payment and receipt were established. The credit disallowance, related interest and penalty, and confiscation-linked reliefs accordingly did not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>