<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 218 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434832</link>
    <description>The HC ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the contributions made by partners should not be treated as the firm&#039;s income under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The court modified the Tribunal&#039;s order, excluding the cash credits related to the two partners from the firm&#039;s income. The appeal was disposed of without any costs awarded, emphasizing that such credits should be assessed at the hands of the partners, not the firm.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2023 15:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=706391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 218 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434832</link>
      <description>The HC ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the contributions made by partners should not be treated as the firm&#039;s income under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The court modified the Tribunal&#039;s order, excluding the cash credits related to the two partners from the firm&#039;s income. The appeal was disposed of without any costs awarded, emphasizing that such credits should be assessed at the hands of the partners, not the firm.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>