https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31994 The court dismissed the application for interim relief, allowing the applications filed by Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to proceed. The court's interpretation of Rule 22 and its provisional assessment mechanism provided a balanced approach to protect both the domestic industry and the interests of new shippers. The court's decision was based on a prima facie reading of Rule 22 and did not constitute a final judgment on the merits of the case. en-us Wed, 14 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31994 The court dismissed the application for interim relief, allowing the applications filed by Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to proceed. The court's interpretation of Rule 22 and its provisional assessment mechanism provided a balanced approach to protect both the domestic industry and the interests of new shippers. The court's decision was based on a prima facie reading of Rule 22 and did not constitute a final judgment on the merits of the case. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 14 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31994