<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 204 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434818</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding the AO&#039;s rejection of books of accounts and application of a 10% profit rate unjustified and in violation of DRP&#039;s directions. The AO&#039;s failure to provide the assessee with an opportunity to furnish additional documents and lack of evidence on excessive related party expenses weakened their position. The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition, ultimately allowing the appeal in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2023 14:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=706377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 204 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434818</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding the AO&#039;s rejection of books of accounts and application of a 10% profit rate unjustified and in violation of DRP&#039;s directions. The AO&#039;s failure to provide the assessee with an opportunity to furnish additional documents and lack of evidence on excessive related party expenses weakened their position. The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition, ultimately allowing the appeal in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>