<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 203 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434817</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, quashing the reassessment on the grounds that there was no fresh or tangible material for reopening the assessment. The reassessment was invalidated as it was based on the same set of facts without any new information, contrary to legal requirements established by previous court decisions. The Tribunal did not delve into other aspects of the case, focusing solely on the lack of new or tangible material for the reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2023 07:28:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=706376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 203 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434817</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, quashing the reassessment on the grounds that there was no fresh or tangible material for reopening the assessment. The reassessment was invalidated as it was based on the same set of facts without any new information, contrary to legal requirements established by previous court decisions. The Tribunal did not delve into other aspects of the case, focusing solely on the lack of new or tangible material for the reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>