<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 196 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434810</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal due to a 43-day delay in filing, which was condoned based on the principle of substantial justice prevailing over technicalities. The disallowance of interest expenses and treatment of business income were upheld, as the appellant failed to provide evidence or challenge lower authorities effectively. The Tribunal emphasized the need for substantiating claims and presenting legal arguments in tax appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2023 07:28:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=706369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 196 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434810</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal due to a 43-day delay in filing, which was condoned based on the principle of substantial justice prevailing over technicalities. The disallowance of interest expenses and treatment of business income were upheld, as the appellant failed to provide evidence or challenge lower authorities effectively. The Tribunal emphasized the need for substantiating claims and presenting legal arguments in tax appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>