<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 191 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434805</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, rejecting the DCF method and accepting the NAV method for determining the arm&#039;s length price of shares. The fair market value was set at Rs.112 per share. Additionally, the transfer pricing addition was deleted as secondary adjustment lacked specific provisions in the Act. The disallowance under Section 14A was restricted to the amount of exempt income earned by the Appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2023 14:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=706364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 191 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434805</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, rejecting the DCF method and accepting the NAV method for determining the arm&#039;s length price of shares. The fair market value was set at Rs.112 per share. Additionally, the transfer pricing addition was deleted as secondary adjustment lacked specific provisions in the Act. The disallowance under Section 14A was restricted to the amount of exempt income earned by the Appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>