https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434799 The HC allowed the writ petition, requiring the petitioner to deposit the differential duty amount within four weeks. Upon deposit, the 2004 Order in Original would be quashed, and the case remanded to the first respondent for reconsideration, taking into account the petitioner's arguments and the 2004 Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) order. The HC determined that this approach would not prejudice the respondents. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions were closed without costs. en-us Tue, 14 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Oct 2023 12:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434799 The HC allowed the writ petition, requiring the petitioner to deposit the differential duty amount within four weeks. Upon deposit, the 2004 Order in Original would be quashed, and the case remanded to the first respondent for reconsideration, taking into account the petitioner's arguments and the 2004 Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) order. The HC determined that this approach would not prejudice the respondents. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions were closed without costs. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 14 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434799