<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 181 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434795</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI due to lack of clarity in the date of service of the Order-in-Original to the appellant, which is crucial for determining the appeal filing period under the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal found the impugned order unreasonable and remanded the matter to the appellate authority for a decision on merit, emphasizing the importance of procedural requirements in legal matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 14:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=706349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 181 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434795</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI due to lack of clarity in the date of service of the Order-in-Original to the appellant, which is crucial for determining the appeal filing period under the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal found the impugned order unreasonable and remanded the matter to the appellate authority for a decision on merit, emphasizing the importance of procedural requirements in legal matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>