<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 169 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434783</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI allowed both appeals in favor of the appellant, permitting them to avail CENVAT Credit on capital goods such as MS Angles, Beams, Plates, Channels, etc. The Tribunal considered the goods as capital goods based on the Revenue&#039;s treatment and the High Court of Gujarat&#039;s decision, which held the previous conflicting decision as not good law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2023 18:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=706333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 169 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434783</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI allowed both appeals in favor of the appellant, permitting them to avail CENVAT Credit on capital goods such as MS Angles, Beams, Plates, Channels, etc. The Tribunal considered the goods as capital goods based on the Revenue&#039;s treatment and the High Court of Gujarat&#039;s decision, which held the previous conflicting decision as not good law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>