https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306892 The court upheld the appointment of a candidate based on marks allocated for holding a Below Poverty Line (BPL) card. Initially, a private respondent scored higher due to BPL category marks, but after objections, her score was reduced. The Collector's decision to grant BPL marks to the private respondent was deemed valid as she was connected to existing BPL cardholders before the advertisement date. The court dismissed the petition, finding no grounds for interference, and confirmed the appointment based on the BPL category marks allocation. en-us Thu, 11 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:21:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306892 The court upheld the appointment of a candidate based on marks allocated for holding a Below Poverty Line (BPL) card. Initially, a private respondent scored higher due to BPL category marks, but after objections, her score was reduced. The Collector's decision to grant BPL marks to the private respondent was deemed valid as she was connected to existing BPL cardholders before the advertisement date. The court dismissed the petition, finding no grounds for interference, and confirmed the appointment based on the BPL category marks allocation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306892