https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306892 Under the selection scheme, 10 marks under the BPL category were available where the candidate or her family members were shown in the BPL list before the advertisement date. On that reading of the eligibility clause and later clarification, the entry of the husband and father-in-law in the BPL ration card satisfied the condition, so the authorities correctly treated the BPL requirement as fulfilled. The cited precedent on the cut-off date did not alter the result because the relevant BPL status existed before the advertisement. The challenge to the award of BPL marks therefore failed, and the selection was upheld. en-us Thu, 11 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Mar 2023 09:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306892 Under the selection scheme, 10 marks under the BPL category were available where the candidate or her family members were shown in the BPL list before the advertisement date. On that reading of the eligibility clause and later clarification, the entry of the husband and father-in-law in the BPL ration card satisfied the condition, so the authorities correctly treated the BPL requirement as fulfilled. The cited precedent on the cut-off date did not alter the result because the relevant BPL status existed before the advertisement. The challenge to the award of BPL marks therefore failed, and the selection was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306892