https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306890 The court dismissed the petition challenging the legality of Gulfisha Fatima's detention, affirming the validity of her judicial custody extension by a competent court. It upheld the jurisdiction of the Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ-02) to extend the remand, citing the de facto doctrine to validate his actions. The court clarified that the NIA Act does not require all UAPA cases to be handled exclusively by Special Courts, emphasizing the ASJ-02's authority as a Sessions Court. Consequently, the petition was deemed not maintainable. en-us Mon, 22 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Mar 2023 22:18:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306890 The court dismissed the petition challenging the legality of Gulfisha Fatima's detention, affirming the validity of her judicial custody extension by a competent court. It upheld the jurisdiction of the Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ-02) to extend the remand, citing the de facto doctrine to validate his actions. The court clarified that the NIA Act does not require all UAPA cases to be handled exclusively by Special Courts, emphasizing the ASJ-02's authority as a Sessions Court. Consequently, the petition was deemed not maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 22 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306890