<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1782 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306889</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the writ petition, quashing the order-in-original dated 31.12.2001, due to the classification issue being decided in favor of the petitioner in a related case. The Court emphasized the need for uniform application of decisions across similar cases and highlighted the discretionary power of judicial review in cases of assessments without authority or resulting in gross injustice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2023 22:18:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=706319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1782 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306889</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the writ petition, quashing the order-in-original dated 31.12.2001, due to the classification issue being decided in favor of the petitioner in a related case. The Court emphasized the need for uniform application of decisions across similar cases and highlighted the discretionary power of judicial review in cases of assessments without authority or resulting in gross injustice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>