https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306886 Uncorroborated police testimony about an alleged communal speech was held insufficient to sustain convictions under communal enmity provisions, because the other witnesses and recovered pamphlets did not support the prosecution version. Possession and control of bombs, explosive materials and a sword were treated as sufficient only to the extent of statutory possession offences: the Arms Act count was altered to the possession-based provision, and the Explosive Substances Act convictions were upheld. The court found no reliable evidence of communal design or terrorist intent, so the IPC communal enmity convictions and UAPA convictions were set aside. The acquittal of the 22nd accused was also upheld. en-us Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Mar 2023 22:18:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306886 Uncorroborated police testimony about an alleged communal speech was held insufficient to sustain convictions under communal enmity provisions, because the other witnesses and recovered pamphlets did not support the prosecution version. Possession and control of bombs, explosive materials and a sword were treated as sufficient only to the extent of statutory possession offences: the Arms Act count was altered to the possession-based provision, and the Explosive Substances Act convictions were upheld. The court found no reliable evidence of communal design or terrorist intent, so the IPC communal enmity convictions and UAPA convictions were set aside. The acquittal of the 22nd accused was also upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306886