<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 164 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL: NEW DELHI PRINCIPAL BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434778</link>
    <description>The Tribunal considered whether the respondent&#039;s right to file a reply to a section 7 petition should remain open where the reply had not been properly brought on record and defects were not cured. The respondent could not produce the filing date or proof of proper filing, and the filing remained under scrutiny in the DMS. On that basis, the Tribunal closed the respondent&#039;s right to file reply.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2023 22:18:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=706308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 164 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL: NEW DELHI PRINCIPAL BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434778</link>
      <description>The Tribunal considered whether the respondent&#039;s right to file a reply to a section 7 petition should remain open where the reply had not been properly brought on record and defects were not cured. The respondent could not produce the filing date or proof of proper filing, and the filing remained under scrutiny in the DMS. On that basis, the Tribunal closed the respondent&#039;s right to file reply.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>