https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306879 The court dismissed the petition, ruling that the petitioner had no legitimate expectation or right to have his land allotment application considered under the old policy once the new policy mandating public auctions was implemented. The court found no basis for promissory estoppel or procedural unfairness, emphasizing public interest and transparency in state actions. The petitioner was ordered to pay the costs of the petition. en-us Wed, 05 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Mar 2023 15:35:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306879 The court dismissed the petition, ruling that the petitioner had no legitimate expectation or right to have his land allotment application considered under the old policy once the new policy mandating public auctions was implemented. The court found no basis for promissory estoppel or procedural unfairness, emphasizing public interest and transparency in state actions. The petitioner was ordered to pay the costs of the petition. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306879