<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 161 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434775</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the writ petition challenging the rejection of a partnership firm&#039;s amendment application under TNGST Act. The court found the respondent failed to adequately consider documents proving partner retirement. The impugned order was quashed, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration with directions to pass final orders within eight weeks, ensuring a fair hearing for the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 16:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=706277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 161 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434775</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the writ petition challenging the rejection of a partnership firm&#039;s amendment application under TNGST Act. The court found the respondent failed to adequately consider documents proving partner retirement. The impugned order was quashed, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration with directions to pass final orders within eight weeks, ensuring a fair hearing for the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>