<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 35 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31981</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under Section 271B of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2002-03. The Court agreed that the non-filing of the audit report was due to genuine reasons, emphasizing that this was a factual finding. Therefore, the appeal against the penalty was dismissed, underscoring the significance of considering the bona fide nature of non-compliance when imposing penalties under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 35 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31981</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under Section 271B of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2002-03. The Court agreed that the non-filing of the audit report was due to genuine reasons, emphasizing that this was a factual finding. Therefore, the appeal against the penalty was dismissed, underscoring the significance of considering the bona fide nature of non-compliance when imposing penalties under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>