<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 138 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434752</link>
    <description>Even where the customs drawback scheme prescribed no express limitation period, the authority had to complete adjudication within a reasonable time, and an unexplained delay of more than eleven years in passing the final order rendered the show cause notice and Order-in-Original vulnerable to quashing. The earlier payment made in 2007 was, however, held not refundable because the refund claim itself was time-barred, and the petitioner could not rely on limitation to defeat the demand while pursuing a stale refund claim. The article states that inordinate delay can invalidate quasi-judicial action, but a separate refund claim remains subject to limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2023 00:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=706244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 138 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434752</link>
      <description>Even where the customs drawback scheme prescribed no express limitation period, the authority had to complete adjudication within a reasonable time, and an unexplained delay of more than eleven years in passing the final order rendered the show cause notice and Order-in-Original vulnerable to quashing. The earlier payment made in 2007 was, however, held not refundable because the refund claim itself was time-barred, and the petitioner could not rely on limitation to defeat the demand while pursuing a stale refund claim. The article states that inordinate delay can invalidate quasi-judicial action, but a separate refund claim remains subject to limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>