<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 148 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31977</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order in a case where the Revenue appealed against the availing of Cenvat credit on inputs for manufacturing gear boxes. The respondents cleared gearboxes to Wind Mills under a specific notification, reversing an amount on exempted goods. The Tribunal found that the respondents complied with Rule 6 by correctly reversing the amount on exempted goods, as per relevant case laws and circulars. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of evidence showing exclusive input usage for wind mill gear boxes and rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeals, disposing of the respondents&#039; cross-objections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 148 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31977</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order in a case where the Revenue appealed against the availing of Cenvat credit on inputs for manufacturing gear boxes. The respondents cleared gearboxes to Wind Mills under a specific notification, reversing an amount on exempted goods. The Tribunal found that the respondents complied with Rule 6 by correctly reversing the amount on exempted goods, as per relevant case laws and circulars. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of evidence showing exclusive input usage for wind mill gear boxes and rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeals, disposing of the respondents&#039; cross-objections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>