https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306860 The Court held the respondent's actions in detaining the petitioner's containers as illegal and contrary to previous judgments. The petitioner was granted demurrage and container charges due to the refusal to permit export, with the court emphasizing the illegality of the customs authorities' actions. The notification prohibiting exports was interpreted to apply prospectively, not retroactively. The petitioner's amendment to include additional prayers for recovery of charges was allowed, with the court directing the respondent to pay the specified amount with interest, highlighting the importance of legal adherence and consequences of misinterpretation. en-us Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Mar 2023 20:59:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306860 The Court held the respondent's actions in detaining the petitioner's containers as illegal and contrary to previous judgments. The petitioner was granted demurrage and container charges due to the refusal to permit export, with the court emphasizing the illegality of the customs authorities' actions. The notification prohibiting exports was interpreted to apply prospectively, not retroactively. The petitioner's amendment to include additional prayers for recovery of charges was allowed, with the court directing the respondent to pay the specified amount with interest, highlighting the importance of legal adherence and consequences of misinterpretation. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306860