<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1349 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306870</link>
    <description>An assessment based on the Indian Bureau of Mines rate and comparative dealer prices for iron ore could not stand without a categorical finding that the dealer had concealed turnover or actually sold the goods at a higher price than disclosed. The text notes that prior appellate and remand orders for later years had rejected use of the benchmark without examining the grade of ore, the nature of the goods sold, and whether a processing or screening plant existed. On that basis, the assessment and appellate orders were set aside and the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration of the factual foundation for invoking the valuation provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2023 20:59:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=706196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1349 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306870</link>
      <description>An assessment based on the Indian Bureau of Mines rate and comparative dealer prices for iron ore could not stand without a categorical finding that the dealer had concealed turnover or actually sold the goods at a higher price than disclosed. The text notes that prior appellate and remand orders for later years had rejected use of the benchmark without examining the grade of ore, the nature of the goods sold, and whether a processing or screening plant existed. On that basis, the assessment and appellate orders were set aside and the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration of the factual foundation for invoking the valuation provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>