<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 208 - HIGH COURT GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31974</link>
    <description>Refund of unutilized deemed Modvat credit under the export incentive scheme was treated as distinct from an ordinary duty-refund claim. Rule 57F(13) and Notification No. 29/96-C.E. (N.T.) allowed credit for inputs used in export goods and permitted refund where adjustment was not possible, but only subject to safeguards, conditions and limitations to be specified by notification. Because no further notification prescribing those restrictions had been issued, the refund claim was not governed by the general limitation applicable under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The deemed credit was therefore refundable under the scheme, and the revenue&#039;s objection on limitation failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 208 - HIGH COURT GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31974</link>
      <description>Refund of unutilized deemed Modvat credit under the export incentive scheme was treated as distinct from an ordinary duty-refund claim. Rule 57F(13) and Notification No. 29/96-C.E. (N.T.) allowed credit for inputs used in export goods and permitted refund where adjustment was not possible, but only subject to safeguards, conditions and limitations to be specified by notification. Because no further notification prescribing those restrictions had been issued, the refund claim was not governed by the general limitation applicable under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The deemed credit was therefore refundable under the scheme, and the revenue&#039;s objection on limitation failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>