<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 207 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31972</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI ruled in favor of M/s. Prince Marine Transport Services in a case involving the importation of an old barge into India. The tribunal determined that the vessel was less than 25 years old, contradicting customs authorities&#039; belief, leading to the setting aside of confiscation and penalties imposed. The tribunal also addressed the discrepancy in the vessel&#039;s year of manufacture, ultimately deciding in favor of the importer based on the builder&#039;s certificate and surveyor&#039;s report. The technical clearance requirement for vessels over 25 years old was found not to be breached, resulting in the favorable outcome for the importer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 207 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31972</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI ruled in favor of M/s. Prince Marine Transport Services in a case involving the importation of an old barge into India. The tribunal determined that the vessel was less than 25 years old, contradicting customs authorities&#039; belief, leading to the setting aside of confiscation and penalties imposed. The tribunal also addressed the discrepancy in the vessel&#039;s year of manufacture, ultimately deciding in favor of the importer based on the builder&#039;s certificate and surveyor&#039;s report. The technical clearance requirement for vessels over 25 years old was found not to be breached, resulting in the favorable outcome for the importer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>