<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Any ad-hoc determination of ALP by TPO de-hors Section 92C(1) of the Act cannot be sustained</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=11165</link>
    <description>Determination of arms length price must be performed using one of the methods specified in Section 92C(1); any ad hoc ALP fixation by the Transfer Pricing Officer outside those prescribed methods is not sustainable. If an assessee&#039;s benchmarking is incorrect, the TPO must apply a prescribed method to re benchmark rather than independently fixing ALP without comparables.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2023 10:13:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2023 10:13:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=706157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Any ad-hoc determination of ALP by TPO de-hors Section 92C(1) of the Act cannot be sustained</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=11165</link>
      <description>Determination of arms length price must be performed using one of the methods specified in Section 92C(1); any ad hoc ALP fixation by the Transfer Pricing Officer outside those prescribed methods is not sustainable. If an assessee&#039;s benchmarking is incorrect, the TPO must apply a prescribed method to re benchmark rather than independently fixing ALP without comparables.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2023 10:13:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=11165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>