<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 112 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434726</link>
    <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging GST registration cancellation. Directed petitioner to file application under section 30 within 15 days and mandated jurisdictional CGST authority to decide expeditiously within three months. The court emphasized procedural compliance and opportunity to rectify statutory deficiencies without imposing costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 16:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=706149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 112 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434726</link>
      <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging GST registration cancellation. Directed petitioner to file application under section 30 within 15 days and mandated jurisdictional CGST authority to decide expeditiously within three months. The court emphasized procedural compliance and opportunity to rectify statutory deficiencies without imposing costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>