<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 89 - ITAT BENGALURU</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434703</link>
    <description>Reimbursements for salaries and related costs of seconded employees were held not taxable as fees for technical services or fees for included services under the Act and the India-USA DTAA. The seconded personnel worked under the Indian entity&#039;s direction and control, while the foreign entity only facilitated salary disbursement and recovered actual costs without any mark-up. Because the payments were cost-to-cost reimbursements for services already subject to tax deduction at source in India, they did not constitute consideration for technical, managerial or consultancy services, and the treaty&#039;s make-available requirement was not met. The addition on that basis was therefore unsustainable, and no withholding obligation arose on the reimbursement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2023 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=706126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 89 - ITAT BENGALURU</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434703</link>
      <description>Reimbursements for salaries and related costs of seconded employees were held not taxable as fees for technical services or fees for included services under the Act and the India-USA DTAA. The seconded personnel worked under the Indian entity&#039;s direction and control, while the foreign entity only facilitated salary disbursement and recovered actual costs without any mark-up. Because the payments were cost-to-cost reimbursements for services already subject to tax deduction at source in India, they did not constitute consideration for technical, managerial or consultancy services, and the treaty&#039;s make-available requirement was not met. The addition on that basis was therefore unsustainable, and no withholding obligation arose on the reimbursement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>