https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434693 The Court held that the retrospective application of the export prohibition notification was illegal, ruling in favor of the respondent exporter. The Customs Authorities were directed to pay demurrage charges with interest for unjustly delaying the clearance of goods. The Court upheld the respondent's choice of a writ petition over a civil suit, emphasizing the legitimacy of seeking remedy through writ jurisdiction. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the compensation for demurrage charges and highlighting the unlawfulness of the Customs Authorities' actions. en-us Fri, 24 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Mar 2023 14:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434693 The Court held that the retrospective application of the export prohibition notification was illegal, ruling in favor of the respondent exporter. The Customs Authorities were directed to pay demurrage charges with interest for unjustly delaying the clearance of goods. The Court upheld the respondent's choice of a writ petition over a civil suit, emphasizing the legitimacy of seeking remedy through writ jurisdiction. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the compensation for demurrage charges and highlighting the unlawfulness of the Customs Authorities' actions. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 24 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434693