<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 65 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434679</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the orders-in-original demanding interest on Royalty and Technical Knowhow fees paid to foreign companies for Intellectual Property Services, ruling that the demands were limited to interest alone and the liability for Service Tax was questionable. The appeals against the interest demands were allowed, and the impugned orders were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2023 19:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=706102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 65 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434679</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the orders-in-original demanding interest on Royalty and Technical Knowhow fees paid to foreign companies for Intellectual Property Services, ruling that the demands were limited to interest alone and the liability for Service Tax was questionable. The appeals against the interest demands were allowed, and the impugned orders were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>