<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 239 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31965</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that duty was not payable on telephone cables destroyed during quality control tests as the cables were not considered fully manufactured until the tests were completed. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following prescribed procedures to demonstrate that the goods became unfit for consumption to qualify for duty remission. The decision aligned with previous tribunal rulings and supported the appellant&#039;s position, ultimately deeming the duty demand unsustainable and allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 239 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31965</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that duty was not payable on telephone cables destroyed during quality control tests as the cables were not considered fully manufactured until the tests were completed. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following prescribed procedures to demonstrate that the goods became unfit for consumption to qualify for duty remission. The decision aligned with previous tribunal rulings and supported the appellant&#039;s position, ultimately deeming the duty demand unsustainable and allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>