<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 43 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434657</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the entire commission payment disallowance. It emphasized procedural fairness and adherence to the principles of natural justice. The tribunal found the commission expenses to be genuine business expenses, rejecting the disallowance by the Assessing Officer. The decision highlighted the potential for double taxation if the disallowance stood, as the recipients had already included the commission in their income returns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2023 08:18:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=706018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 43 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434657</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the entire commission payment disallowance. It emphasized procedural fairness and adherence to the principles of natural justice. The tribunal found the commission expenses to be genuine business expenses, rejecting the disallowance by the Assessing Officer. The decision highlighted the potential for double taxation if the disallowance stood, as the recipients had already included the commission in their income returns.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>