<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 37 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434651</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the assessing officer for reexamination due to discrepancies in the findings regarding the denial of the claim under section 54 for the construction of a residential house. The appellant provided evidence such as construction agreements and bills, while authorities questioned the lack of on-site proof. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a thorough review of evidence for a fair determination of the claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2023 08:18:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=706012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 37 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434651</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the assessing officer for reexamination due to discrepancies in the findings regarding the denial of the claim under section 54 for the construction of a residential house. The appellant provided evidence such as construction agreements and bills, while authorities questioned the lack of on-site proof. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a thorough review of evidence for a fair determination of the claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>