<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 34 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434648</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowances of swap contract and mark-to-market losses for AY 2015-16 and AY 2016-17. The Tribunal found that the losses were allowable based on consistent accounting practices and judicial precedents, distinguishing between realized and notional losses. The decisions were supported by previous rulings and lacked contrary judicial pronouncements, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 16:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=706009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 34 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434648</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowances of swap contract and mark-to-market losses for AY 2015-16 and AY 2016-17. The Tribunal found that the losses were allowable based on consistent accounting practices and judicial precedents, distinguishing between realized and notional losses. The decisions were supported by previous rulings and lacked contrary judicial pronouncements, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>