<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 31 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434645</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the upward adjustment of notional interest on outstanding receivables made by the Revenue. The Tribunal found that interest should not be charged for outstanding periods less than 180 days, contrary to the Revenue&#039;s argument based on a 335-day delay. The Tribunal supported the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, emphasizing adherence to RBI policies on credit periods and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2023 08:18:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=706006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 31 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434645</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the upward adjustment of notional interest on outstanding receivables made by the Revenue. The Tribunal found that interest should not be charged for outstanding periods less than 180 days, contrary to the Revenue&#039;s argument based on a 335-day delay. The Tribunal supported the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, emphasizing adherence to RBI policies on credit periods and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>