<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 18 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434632</link>
    <description>Provident fund and gratuity dues of employees and workmen are statutorily protected under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and cannot be treated as ordinary claims for partial payment under a resolution plan; they must be paid in full up to the insolvency commencement date, after crediting any sums already disbursed. The approved resolution plan was otherwise not found to suffer from any material irregularity, because objections on undervaluation and process non-compliance were not supported by sufficient evidence to justify wider interference. The plan was therefore substantially upheld, subject to correction for full payment of unpaid provident fund and gratuity dues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2023 02:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 18 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434632</link>
      <description>Provident fund and gratuity dues of employees and workmen are statutorily protected under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and cannot be treated as ordinary claims for partial payment under a resolution plan; they must be paid in full up to the insolvency commencement date, after crediting any sums already disbursed. The approved resolution plan was otherwise not found to suffer from any material irregularity, because objections on undervaluation and process non-compliance were not supported by sufficient evidence to justify wider interference. The plan was therefore substantially upheld, subject to correction for full payment of unpaid provident fund and gratuity dues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>